therock003
May 5, 12:41 PM
What SIP program are you using?
Actually i dont use MAC, i just have an iPhone, and i wonder if i can follow the procedure the way a MAC can handle phone calls, into my iPhone.
I just need to take advantage of the PBAP (PhoneBook Access Profile of bluetooth) and handle the calls of my main phone on the iPhone. :eek:
I know it's crazy, but with a little research i hope i can finally achieve that!!
Actually i dont use MAC, i just have an iPhone, and i wonder if i can follow the procedure the way a MAC can handle phone calls, into my iPhone.
I just need to take advantage of the PBAP (PhoneBook Access Profile of bluetooth) and handle the calls of my main phone on the iPhone. :eek:
I know it's crazy, but with a little research i hope i can finally achieve that!!
kretzy
Dec 18, 06:37 PM
Pretty lame, but I'm on holidays and have nothing better to do lol. Sorry for the dodgy Photoshopping :o
mrdm
Apr 26, 09:36 PM
Hi,
What is the best way to archive only a *portion* of my iPhoto library? My library is over 30 GB and I really only need to access the last 12 months or so.
It is too large to use DVD/CD and I have an external HDD.
I've read about creating a smartfolder with a date definition, selecting that folder and then doing "file-->export". This seems to export each individual file. I assume I can import these at a later time if needed? Will all of the metatag (date, time, location, etc.) be preserved.
Thanks for any help.
What is the best way to archive only a *portion* of my iPhoto library? My library is over 30 GB and I really only need to access the last 12 months or so.
It is too large to use DVD/CD and I have an external HDD.
I've read about creating a smartfolder with a date definition, selecting that folder and then doing "file-->export". This seems to export each individual file. I assume I can import these at a later time if needed? Will all of the metatag (date, time, location, etc.) be preserved.
Thanks for any help.
ClassicBean
Jan 15, 03:14 PM
I Just downloaded the album. Most of the songs are in Hebrew (she's Israeli) and I don't speak the language aside from a few choice words that, if used, would ban me from MacRumors for eternity. Very melodic album nonetheless.
mainstreetmark
Jan 31, 10:01 AM
Wiki searching has always been really crappy. You have to get the spelling right and you can't use small words.
In your case, I suspect you're running into a limitation with earlier versions of mysql where fulltext searches required a minimum of 4 letters. In building it's index, mysql threw out all 3-letter and below words to reduce the size of the index. The side effect is that "G5" and even "Mac" aren't searchable.
(Now, this is only a theory, as I haven't dived into the wiki code very far. Also, newer versions of mysql fix that issue).
In your case, I suspect you're running into a limitation with earlier versions of mysql where fulltext searches required a minimum of 4 letters. In building it's index, mysql threw out all 3-letter and below words to reduce the size of the index. The side effect is that "G5" and even "Mac" aren't searchable.
(Now, this is only a theory, as I haven't dived into the wiki code very far. Also, newer versions of mysql fix that issue).
The Samurai
May 6, 03:46 PM
Its coming, its coming (no not that!)
Gaming tests etc to follow shortly - Mafia 2, Crysis 2, Portal 2 and Starcraft to be specifc. Gaming tests are a bit hard for me - not the best of players and never played any of these apart from COD MW2 and Blops. But nevertheless, if its what you guys want to see - so be it. Just need a day or two to put some decent gameplay together.
Gaming tests etc to follow shortly - Mafia 2, Crysis 2, Portal 2 and Starcraft to be specifc. Gaming tests are a bit hard for me - not the best of players and never played any of these apart from COD MW2 and Blops. But nevertheless, if its what you guys want to see - so be it. Just need a day or two to put some decent gameplay together.
Mala
Feb 7, 02:37 PM
Also, when I probed deeper into the HP settings, there are no CUPS+GIMP print drivers for the LaserJet 1200. There are such drivers listed for most of the other HP models (though not all), but not for the LaserJet 1200.
It's weird the way the LaserJet 1200 still appears twice under "Model name" in the Printer Setup Utility's "Add Printer" dialogue.
It's weird the way the LaserJet 1200 still appears twice under "Model name" in the Printer Setup Utility's "Add Printer" dialogue.
Blue Velvet
Mar 28, 10:10 AM
Proper Keynesian response to a recession, particularly one headed quickly for a depression is deficit spending. Proven time and time again.
However, the neo-liberal whizz-kids who have been generally in charge of the consensus over the past 30 years always forget that the flip-side of the equation is to build a surplus when times are good, something that the Clinton (D) administration did by raising taxes on higher income earners and then handed it over to George W. Bush (R) who pissed it up the wall, giving tax cuts to billionaires and running up two wars without any of it being paid for in the long run, with the worst record of job creation of any president in history.
Cue massive recession and economic disaster after a housing bubble stoked by unregulated lenders, the dying days of the Bush and the incoming Obama administration had little choice to spend, because a recession is a problem of demand, not supply... as we can clearly see when corporations are now sitting on huge profits and the Dow is climbing steadily. But they're not creating jobs, because demand is slack, almost solely because of high unemployment.
Supply-side is a failure. It only looked good in the 80s because the Fed squeezed inflation out of the system by raising interest rates, then dropping them again... but interest rates across developed economies these days can hardly go lower. The limits of monetary policy, apart from measured quantitative easing, can go no further. Like Keynes said: like pushing on a piece of string.
The only way to raise demand is to pursue policies that further full employment. More jobs, more money in people's pockets, more revenue, more demand. However, Republicans in congress, after wasting many months of pursuing fruitless bills about abortion, defunding their pet hates etc. have a new, bright idea up their sleeves which I'm sure every forum member would like to see for themselves:
Lower wages and more unemployment
In a little-noticed economic report distributed by the office House Speaker John Boehner last week, the Republican staff of the Joint Economic Committee attempted to refute criticisms that the GOP’s economic agenda would deliver too much pain too fast.
The paper makes the party’s anti-Keynesian case that fiscal consolidation (read: spending cuts) can spur immediate economic growth and reduce unemployment. But in making that case, the Republicans may also have given Democrats some political ammunition.
For example, the paper predicts that cutting the number of public employees would send highly skilled workers job hunting in the private sector, which in turn would lead to lower labor costs and increased employment. But “lowering labor costs” is economist-speak for lowering wages — does the GOP want to be in the position of advocating for lower wages for voters who work in the private sector?
http://www.nationaljournal.com/economy/gop-prescription-spending-cuts-and-lower-wages-equal-more-jobs-20110325
Why it's foolish:
“Much of this study relies on the growth performance of a few (very) small open economies — Sweden, Canada, New Zealand, notably — after 1994,” said University of Texas economist James Galbraith, who was executive director of the JEC in the early eighties. “It’s easy to look good if you are a small country with a freshly devalued currency selling into a world boom. The ‘lessons’ will not apply to the United States, which cannot just contract domestically, devalue the dollar (sacrificing our reserve-currency position) and expect the rest of the world to bail us out by buying our exports.”
The GOP argument “would have more force if the economy today looked more like the economy in the 1990s expansion — the longest in our country’s history and the last time we had a balanced budget,” Chad Stone, chief economist for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, wrote in response to the JEC report. “In today’s economy, weak demand, not competition for funds, is the much more plausible explanation for inadequate investment.”
As the Republican report itself acknowledges, economists at the International Monetary Fund — no shrinking violet when it comes to prescribing harsh spending cuts — have contended that many of the studies cited in the report are flawed. In the October 2010 World Economic Outlook, IMF researchers asserted that cutting spending “typically reduces output and raises unemployment in the short term,” even if the non-Keynesian effects cushion the blow slightly.
We're already seeing the results of cutting spending during a recession over here in the UK and also Ireland. Unemployment on the rise, revenues down, services slashed, growth down.
Why do we put these fools in time and time again? Because many of us think like peasants:
This new Holy Trinity of right-wing basket cases has been pushing all sorts of crazy hallucinations of late, from Bachmann warning that the Americorps program would eventually be turned into a regime of forced re-education for American youth, to Beck’s meanderings about Obama creating FEMA-run concentration camps to warehouse conservative dissidents, to Norris and Beck stirring up talk of secessionist movements. And a lot of people are having fun with this, because, well, it’s funny. It’s like a Farrelly Brothers version of right-wing political agitation. But it’s also kind of sad.
After all, the reason the winger crowd can’t find a way to be coherently angry right now is because this country has no healthy avenues for genuine populist outrage. It never has. The setup always goes the other way: when the excesses of business interests and their political proteges in Washington leave the regular guy broke and screwed, the response is always for the lower and middle classes to split down the middle and find reasons to get pissed off not at their greedy bosses but at each other. That’s why even people like Beck’s audience, who I’d wager are mostly lower-income people, can’t imagine themselves protesting against the Wall Street barons who in actuality are the ones who ****ed them over. Beck pointedly compared the AIG protesters to Bolsheviks: “[The Communists] basically said ‘Eat the rich, they did this to you, get ‘em, kill ‘em!’” He then said the AIG and G20 protesters were identical: “It’s a different style, but the sentiments are exactly the same: Find ‘em, get ‘em, kill ‘em!’” Beck has an audience that’s been trained that the rich are not appropriate targets for anger, unless of course they’re Hollywood liberals, or George Soros, or in some other way linked to some acceptable class of villain, to liberals, immigrants, atheists, etc. — Ted Turner, say, married to Jane Fonda.
But actual rich people can’t ever be the target. It’s a classic peasant mentality: going into fits of groveling and bowing whenever the master’s carriage rides by, then fuming against the Turks in Crimea or the Jews in the Pale or whoever after spending fifteen hard hours in the fields. You know you’re a peasant when you worship the very people who are right now, this minute, conning you and taking your ****. Whatever the master does, you’re on board. When you get frisky, he sticks a big cross in the middle of your village, and you spend the rest of your life praying to it with big googly eyes. Or he puts out newspapers full of innuendo about this or that faraway group and you immediately salute and rush off to join the hate squad. A good peasant is loyal, simpleminded, and full of misdirected anger. And that’s what we’ve got now, a lot of misdirected anger searching around for a non-target to mis-punish… can’t be mad at AIG, can’t be mad at Citi or Goldman Sachs. The real villains have to be the anti-AIG protesters! After all, those people earned those bonuses! If ever there was a textbook case of peasant thinking, it’s struggling middle-class Americans burned up in defense of taxpayer-funded bonuses to millionaires. It’s really weird stuff. And bound to get weirder, I imagine, as this crisis gets worse and more complicated.
http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/04/14/americas-peasant-mentality/
So, the sight of the video in question, from a lobbying organisation with links to Jack Abramoff and that represents Exxon-Mobil amongst others, decrying government spending is nothing but empty but loud crap of the highest order. What they want is for government to spend money on them. Screw those who have lost their livelihoods, their jobs, their homes in the biggest recession in any of our lifetimes, let those suckers pay the bill. In fact, screw you, take a pay cut, be fearful of losing your job with all your benefits. We'll also press to weaken child labour laws so you're competing with kids...
Living standards have remained stagnant over the past decades, papered over by a housing bubble and cheap goods made in China while your healthcare costs have been going through the roof. But time and time again, you put the same oafs in who wrap themselves in the flag and carry a cross.
Jesus wept.
However, the neo-liberal whizz-kids who have been generally in charge of the consensus over the past 30 years always forget that the flip-side of the equation is to build a surplus when times are good, something that the Clinton (D) administration did by raising taxes on higher income earners and then handed it over to George W. Bush (R) who pissed it up the wall, giving tax cuts to billionaires and running up two wars without any of it being paid for in the long run, with the worst record of job creation of any president in history.
Cue massive recession and economic disaster after a housing bubble stoked by unregulated lenders, the dying days of the Bush and the incoming Obama administration had little choice to spend, because a recession is a problem of demand, not supply... as we can clearly see when corporations are now sitting on huge profits and the Dow is climbing steadily. But they're not creating jobs, because demand is slack, almost solely because of high unemployment.
Supply-side is a failure. It only looked good in the 80s because the Fed squeezed inflation out of the system by raising interest rates, then dropping them again... but interest rates across developed economies these days can hardly go lower. The limits of monetary policy, apart from measured quantitative easing, can go no further. Like Keynes said: like pushing on a piece of string.
The only way to raise demand is to pursue policies that further full employment. More jobs, more money in people's pockets, more revenue, more demand. However, Republicans in congress, after wasting many months of pursuing fruitless bills about abortion, defunding their pet hates etc. have a new, bright idea up their sleeves which I'm sure every forum member would like to see for themselves:
Lower wages and more unemployment
In a little-noticed economic report distributed by the office House Speaker John Boehner last week, the Republican staff of the Joint Economic Committee attempted to refute criticisms that the GOP’s economic agenda would deliver too much pain too fast.
The paper makes the party’s anti-Keynesian case that fiscal consolidation (read: spending cuts) can spur immediate economic growth and reduce unemployment. But in making that case, the Republicans may also have given Democrats some political ammunition.
For example, the paper predicts that cutting the number of public employees would send highly skilled workers job hunting in the private sector, which in turn would lead to lower labor costs and increased employment. But “lowering labor costs” is economist-speak for lowering wages — does the GOP want to be in the position of advocating for lower wages for voters who work in the private sector?
http://www.nationaljournal.com/economy/gop-prescription-spending-cuts-and-lower-wages-equal-more-jobs-20110325
Why it's foolish:
“Much of this study relies on the growth performance of a few (very) small open economies — Sweden, Canada, New Zealand, notably — after 1994,” said University of Texas economist James Galbraith, who was executive director of the JEC in the early eighties. “It’s easy to look good if you are a small country with a freshly devalued currency selling into a world boom. The ‘lessons’ will not apply to the United States, which cannot just contract domestically, devalue the dollar (sacrificing our reserve-currency position) and expect the rest of the world to bail us out by buying our exports.”
The GOP argument “would have more force if the economy today looked more like the economy in the 1990s expansion — the longest in our country’s history and the last time we had a balanced budget,” Chad Stone, chief economist for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, wrote in response to the JEC report. “In today’s economy, weak demand, not competition for funds, is the much more plausible explanation for inadequate investment.”
As the Republican report itself acknowledges, economists at the International Monetary Fund — no shrinking violet when it comes to prescribing harsh spending cuts — have contended that many of the studies cited in the report are flawed. In the October 2010 World Economic Outlook, IMF researchers asserted that cutting spending “typically reduces output and raises unemployment in the short term,” even if the non-Keynesian effects cushion the blow slightly.
We're already seeing the results of cutting spending during a recession over here in the UK and also Ireland. Unemployment on the rise, revenues down, services slashed, growth down.
Why do we put these fools in time and time again? Because many of us think like peasants:
This new Holy Trinity of right-wing basket cases has been pushing all sorts of crazy hallucinations of late, from Bachmann warning that the Americorps program would eventually be turned into a regime of forced re-education for American youth, to Beck’s meanderings about Obama creating FEMA-run concentration camps to warehouse conservative dissidents, to Norris and Beck stirring up talk of secessionist movements. And a lot of people are having fun with this, because, well, it’s funny. It’s like a Farrelly Brothers version of right-wing political agitation. But it’s also kind of sad.
After all, the reason the winger crowd can’t find a way to be coherently angry right now is because this country has no healthy avenues for genuine populist outrage. It never has. The setup always goes the other way: when the excesses of business interests and their political proteges in Washington leave the regular guy broke and screwed, the response is always for the lower and middle classes to split down the middle and find reasons to get pissed off not at their greedy bosses but at each other. That’s why even people like Beck’s audience, who I’d wager are mostly lower-income people, can’t imagine themselves protesting against the Wall Street barons who in actuality are the ones who ****ed them over. Beck pointedly compared the AIG protesters to Bolsheviks: “[The Communists] basically said ‘Eat the rich, they did this to you, get ‘em, kill ‘em!’” He then said the AIG and G20 protesters were identical: “It’s a different style, but the sentiments are exactly the same: Find ‘em, get ‘em, kill ‘em!’” Beck has an audience that’s been trained that the rich are not appropriate targets for anger, unless of course they’re Hollywood liberals, or George Soros, or in some other way linked to some acceptable class of villain, to liberals, immigrants, atheists, etc. — Ted Turner, say, married to Jane Fonda.
But actual rich people can’t ever be the target. It’s a classic peasant mentality: going into fits of groveling and bowing whenever the master’s carriage rides by, then fuming against the Turks in Crimea or the Jews in the Pale or whoever after spending fifteen hard hours in the fields. You know you’re a peasant when you worship the very people who are right now, this minute, conning you and taking your ****. Whatever the master does, you’re on board. When you get frisky, he sticks a big cross in the middle of your village, and you spend the rest of your life praying to it with big googly eyes. Or he puts out newspapers full of innuendo about this or that faraway group and you immediately salute and rush off to join the hate squad. A good peasant is loyal, simpleminded, and full of misdirected anger. And that’s what we’ve got now, a lot of misdirected anger searching around for a non-target to mis-punish… can’t be mad at AIG, can’t be mad at Citi or Goldman Sachs. The real villains have to be the anti-AIG protesters! After all, those people earned those bonuses! If ever there was a textbook case of peasant thinking, it’s struggling middle-class Americans burned up in defense of taxpayer-funded bonuses to millionaires. It’s really weird stuff. And bound to get weirder, I imagine, as this crisis gets worse and more complicated.
http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/04/14/americas-peasant-mentality/
So, the sight of the video in question, from a lobbying organisation with links to Jack Abramoff and that represents Exxon-Mobil amongst others, decrying government spending is nothing but empty but loud crap of the highest order. What they want is for government to spend money on them. Screw those who have lost their livelihoods, their jobs, their homes in the biggest recession in any of our lifetimes, let those suckers pay the bill. In fact, screw you, take a pay cut, be fearful of losing your job with all your benefits. We'll also press to weaken child labour laws so you're competing with kids...
Living standards have remained stagnant over the past decades, papered over by a housing bubble and cheap goods made in China while your healthcare costs have been going through the roof. But time and time again, you put the same oafs in who wrap themselves in the flag and carry a cross.
Jesus wept.
lamonsas
May 5, 02:16 PM
I didn't think about that, do u really need to choose between the iPod and the student discount? If I have to choose then ill take the student discount.
wpotere
Apr 29, 07:35 PM
Disregard
macingman
Mar 18, 12:33 AM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)
Nice find, thanks for sharing. Cool piece of apple history.
Nice find, thanks for sharing. Cool piece of apple history.
Roderick Usher
Aug 30, 11:34 AM
In the vintage Mac world, the 80s era machines are beginning to need capacitor replacements. The thinking is to just do all the caps, simply because the others are likely to go soon anyway.
I have a Rev-0 Apple II from '77 whose power supply clearly has a cap that's near death - a loud *pop!* whenever I flip the switch. For now, I've gotten around this by just leaving the switch in the On position and hooking up a Kensington System Saver fan, whose switch is fine. I'm just buying time though. :)
I have a Rev-0 Apple II from '77 whose power supply clearly has a cap that's near death - a loud *pop!* whenever I flip the switch. For now, I've gotten around this by just leaving the switch in the On position and hooking up a Kensington System Saver fan, whose switch is fine. I'm just buying time though. :)
Labbiqa
Apr 25, 07:55 AM
It's been weeks now. My mac has forgotten everything. Some stuff just pop ups, and then I have to approve it or not. Stuff like if I give some program permission to do something. And then it always forget the password to wi-fi. Everytime I restart it or it goes on sleep mode, it asks for the password. And today I can't even get on the net because it has forgotten the ip-address.
It all began after I restarted my mac normally, as usual.
Someone who know what is wrong, and tell me what to do?
It all began after I restarted my mac normally, as usual.
Someone who know what is wrong, and tell me what to do?
d0hutch
Feb 9, 03:11 PM
I am feeling very American Psycho today and thus want to see everyone's business card. Post photos of your business card!
Flying Llama
Aug 17, 11:56 AM
Is it just me or is everyone starting to put links to their avatar submisions?
BTW I like it!
BTW I like it!
Angelchild
Jun 4, 03:49 PM
nice!!
jbembe
Nov 2, 08:18 PM
I can't figure out how to place a song in the category of "simply like" and not recommended.
Anybody know?
Anybody know?
blueroom
Mar 28, 12:59 AM
I'm having the same problem, the answer might be the NVidia driver. I'm going to try this driver.
http://www.laptopvideo2go.com/drivers
http://www.laptopvideo2go.com/drivers
MacRumors
Aug 9, 01:24 PM
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/iphone/2010/08/09/revamped-atandt-app-allows-u-verse-subscribers-to-download-select-tv-content/)
http://images.macrumors.com/article/2010/08/09/142235-u-verse_1.jpg http://images.macrumors.com/article/2010/08/09/142235-u-verse_2.jpg
AT&T today announced (http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=18230&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=31017) the launch of its revamped and renamed U-verse Mobile application [App Store (http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/u-verse-mobile/id312886438?mt=8)], bringing customers of the company's U-verse television service the ability to not only schedule DVR recordings remotely but also to download selected TV content for viewing on their iOS devices.U-verse Mobile replaces the popular Mobile Remote Access for iPhone app and incorporates the ability to browse the U-verse TV program guide, view program descriptions, schedule and manage your DVR recordings, while adding the ability to download available episodes over any Wi-Fi connection, and watch them in full-screen mode on your iPhone from anywhere. U-verse TV customers already enjoy the flexibility of remote DVR management. More than 100,000 U-verse TV customers use the Web and Mobile Remote Access apps every month.
"We're making it possible for you to watch TV shows on your iPhone at no extra charge. It's just one more valuable and innovative feature available on U-verse TV," said David Christopher, chief marketing officer, AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets. "Our U-verse multi-screen promise is now a reality for millions of U-verse TV customers, with content available on U-verse TV, U-verse Online, and today, U-verse Mobile. No cable provider comes close to matching the cross-platform experience we're delivering today, and we'll continue to add unique features that further integrate these screens."The new download service is available to customers subscribing to AT&T's U300 package or higher. Content is currently available from "several popular networks" with more networks to be added over time.
AT&T's U-verse application launched (http://www.macrumors.com/iphone/2009/06/18/atandts-u-verse-iphone-application-appears-in-app-store/) a little over a year ago and offered remote DVR scheduling. The company had been rumored (http://www.macrumors.com/iphone/2008/09/16/atandt-working-on-iphone-u-verse-integration/) to be working on a more substantial integration (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/03/23/more-details-on-next-generation-iphone-3g-netbook-due-this-summer/) of U-verse with the iPhone. But even now, users are restricted to downloading content from AT&T's mobile library of shows rather than direct live integration with the customer's DVR.
Article Link: Revamped AT&T App Allows U-Verse Subscribers to Download Select TV Content (http://www.macrumors.com/iphone/2010/08/09/revamped-atandt-app-allows-u-verse-subscribers-to-download-select-tv-content/)
http://images.macrumors.com/article/2010/08/09/142235-u-verse_1.jpg http://images.macrumors.com/article/2010/08/09/142235-u-verse_2.jpg
AT&T today announced (http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=18230&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=31017) the launch of its revamped and renamed U-verse Mobile application [App Store (http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/u-verse-mobile/id312886438?mt=8)], bringing customers of the company's U-verse television service the ability to not only schedule DVR recordings remotely but also to download selected TV content for viewing on their iOS devices.U-verse Mobile replaces the popular Mobile Remote Access for iPhone app and incorporates the ability to browse the U-verse TV program guide, view program descriptions, schedule and manage your DVR recordings, while adding the ability to download available episodes over any Wi-Fi connection, and watch them in full-screen mode on your iPhone from anywhere. U-verse TV customers already enjoy the flexibility of remote DVR management. More than 100,000 U-verse TV customers use the Web and Mobile Remote Access apps every month.
"We're making it possible for you to watch TV shows on your iPhone at no extra charge. It's just one more valuable and innovative feature available on U-verse TV," said David Christopher, chief marketing officer, AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets. "Our U-verse multi-screen promise is now a reality for millions of U-verse TV customers, with content available on U-verse TV, U-verse Online, and today, U-verse Mobile. No cable provider comes close to matching the cross-platform experience we're delivering today, and we'll continue to add unique features that further integrate these screens."The new download service is available to customers subscribing to AT&T's U300 package or higher. Content is currently available from "several popular networks" with more networks to be added over time.
AT&T's U-verse application launched (http://www.macrumors.com/iphone/2009/06/18/atandts-u-verse-iphone-application-appears-in-app-store/) a little over a year ago and offered remote DVR scheduling. The company had been rumored (http://www.macrumors.com/iphone/2008/09/16/atandt-working-on-iphone-u-verse-integration/) to be working on a more substantial integration (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/03/23/more-details-on-next-generation-iphone-3g-netbook-due-this-summer/) of U-verse with the iPhone. But even now, users are restricted to downloading content from AT&T's mobile library of shows rather than direct live integration with the customer's DVR.
Article Link: Revamped AT&T App Allows U-Verse Subscribers to Download Select TV Content (http://www.macrumors.com/iphone/2010/08/09/revamped-atandt-app-allows-u-verse-subscribers-to-download-select-tv-content/)
mojOH
Apr 2, 11:05 PM
I finally got mine today. Hooray for persistence!
rozwell
Nov 20, 11:02 AM
i love flash sites and this one is interesting, but i defiantly agree with the accessibility comment, which is odd, because i feel that interaction, especially when its a highly immersive and exploratory experience, leaves a much more vibrant and notable mark than more static sites. i think also one other thing to point out, interaction removed completely, is that this site is very well designed visually (which is where most people fail IMO).
a quick break down of simple tricks.
- uses flashes drawing API
- mimics 3d using scale, rotation and color.
- sound architecture also aides into tricking you into depth (though i feel the pencil sounds are a bit random)
a quick break down of simple tricks.
- uses flashes drawing API
- mimics 3d using scale, rotation and color.
- sound architecture also aides into tricking you into depth (though i feel the pencil sounds are a bit random)
vikings72888
Nov 13, 12:04 PM
i tried doing that but it dosent give me the option as what file format 2 save it as when i go to save as
SR71
Apr 17, 10:21 AM
Hmm, have you tried rebooting your MBA? Try that see if it works. If that doesn't work I would suggest trying it in another browser to see if it works then. If that still doesn't solve it, I think you should re-install Mac OS X using the software reinstall drive that came with your MBA. If that doesn't fix it, bring it in to an Apple store or call Apple to setup a Genius Bar appointment.
Good luck!
Good luck!
DmbShn41
May 1, 12:53 PM
SO, let's try a couple of things first:
1) Insert disc 1, and power the laptop down.
2)With the laptop turned off, hold down the C key on the keyboard, and while holding the key down, press the power button. Continue holding the C key down until you see the grey Apple logo in the middle of the screen. This is booting from the CD. You should get to a menu, and from the top menu bar, it should say 'Utilities' (depending on version of OS). Select Disk Utility. Select the HD, and erase.
Unsure of all what happened previously, but wiping the drive and starting from new may help.
After erase is complete, power down laptop. Make sure disc 1 is still in drive. This time, hold down the C key, power the laptop up. Follow the prompts to installing the OS. Hopefully, this will work. Let me know. If this doesn't take care of issue, it may point to another issue, possibly hard drive. Not uncommon, not a major install, just more of a time consuming install. Can get them relatively cheap from all over. I prefer MicroCenter because of their volume prices. I have an earlier model of iBook, the Clamshell G3 366. I also had an iBook G4 1.2 Ghz, both required a hard drive within months of me owning them. Replaced hard drives, and they are still running to this day.
Sorry you haven't gotten many responses on here. Older items dont garner as much attention, but this is still a great place to get information.
1) Insert disc 1, and power the laptop down.
2)With the laptop turned off, hold down the C key on the keyboard, and while holding the key down, press the power button. Continue holding the C key down until you see the grey Apple logo in the middle of the screen. This is booting from the CD. You should get to a menu, and from the top menu bar, it should say 'Utilities' (depending on version of OS). Select Disk Utility. Select the HD, and erase.
Unsure of all what happened previously, but wiping the drive and starting from new may help.
After erase is complete, power down laptop. Make sure disc 1 is still in drive. This time, hold down the C key, power the laptop up. Follow the prompts to installing the OS. Hopefully, this will work. Let me know. If this doesn't take care of issue, it may point to another issue, possibly hard drive. Not uncommon, not a major install, just more of a time consuming install. Can get them relatively cheap from all over. I prefer MicroCenter because of their volume prices. I have an earlier model of iBook, the Clamshell G3 366. I also had an iBook G4 1.2 Ghz, both required a hard drive within months of me owning them. Replaced hard drives, and they are still running to this day.
Sorry you haven't gotten many responses on here. Older items dont garner as much attention, but this is still a great place to get information.
No comments:
Post a Comment